![]() |
Data of the stratospheric balloon launched on 6/8/1993For TIMAX (Telescopio Imageador de Raios X)
|
Details of the balloon and launch operationsLaunch site:Aeroporto de Birigui, Sao Paulo, Brasil Launch team: SLB Balloon: Open balloon (zero pressure) Volume: Winzen - 186.000 m3 Serial number: - Flight identification number: - Campaign: No Data Payload weight: 600 kgs Gondola weight: - Overall weight: - The balloon was launched from Birigui Airport on June 8th, 1993, at 21:27 UTC, by the Balloon Launching Center of INPE. The balloon reached float altitude of 42.4 km at 24:00 UT, and remained at this altitude for near 8 hours. The conditions were excellent for a balloon flight and for the astronomical hard Xray observations intended. |
ImagesClick to enlarge. © |
|||||||
Description of the payload or experiment
TIMAX (Telescopio Imageador de Raios X) Responsable institution: INPE (Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais) - Divisão de Astrofísica Principal Investigator: Joao Braga - Thyrso Villela The TIMAX experiment, was the first Xray imaging telescope entirely conceived, built and launched by a country in the Southern Hemisphere. It was a prototype for the much larger experiment MASCO flown in 2004 by the INPE. :: The MASK :: The mask of the TIMAX experiment consisted of a 2 x 2 cyclic repetition of a basic 7 x 5 URA pattern, attached in one of the sides of a carbon fiber wheel (material completely transparent for hard Xrays). Each opaque element was a 4.45cmside square made of 3mmthick lead and 1mmthick copper material providing a graded shield. In the opposite side of the wheel, a bar which is also part of the mask and made with the same materials is supported in such a way that it is free to rotate around the center of the mask. If the bar rotates by 90º and the mask by 180º the scientists obtained an antimask of the original mask. This was a new and elegant way to get an antimask in codedaperture telescopes with neither addition of an extra weight to the experiment nor further mechanical complex manipulations, which have always hindered the operation of similar experiments. :: Detectors :: The positionsensitive detector (PSD) plane consisted of 35 cilindrical NaI(Tl) detectors, 2 mm thick and 4.45 cm in diameter, with an useful sensitive diameter of 3.18 cm, placed in a matrix array of 7 x 5 to be compatible with the URA pattern used. The total geometric area was ~400 cm2. Each detector was coupled to a photomultiplier and these were powered by five high voltage units (900 V). The detectors operated in the 30100 keV range, set by lowerlevel and upperlevel discriminators. The whole detector system was passively shielded on the sides and on the back by 3mmthick copper and 1mm lead plates. :: Electronics :: Each PMT pulse produced by a scintillation event due to a Xray interaction in one of the detectors was analized in 32 energy channels. The onboard electronics then identified the detector in which the event ocurred, then added the event time read from an internal clock and finally a microprocessor formated all the information, including housekeeping data (temperature, atmospheric pressure, etc) of the gondola, for subsequent transmission by telemetry. There was no data storage onboard. :: Gondola :: In order to allow the telescope to point at high elevation angles, the support system was designed to be placed offcenter in the balloon gondola. In this way, the detector system, including the collimator and shielding parts, and the codedmask which was attached to a carbonfiber wheel driven by a motor, were placed in one side of the gondola in a 'towerlike' metal structural frame supported and balanced by a horizontal axis that allowed the telescope to point in a specific elevation angle. On the other side were allocated the electronics rack, the telemetry system and the batteries. The entire gondola rotated in azimuth, with the pointing in a specific azimuth angle being controlled and stabilized by a system based on a geomagnetic sensor with a accuracy of 1º. The telescope 'tower' was positioned in elevation by a shaft encoder with a 0.5º accuracy. The pointing system was operated in manual mode through commands sent from the ground or in a semiautomatic way following the source path in the sky, given its initial position and the balloon velocity vector. The total weight of the experiment (including gondola frame, telescope, electronics and telemetry racks, magnetometer, batteries and ballast system) was 600 kg. | ||||||||
Performance in flight and data obtainedThe external temperature at float altitude remained near 30º C. This was completely unexpected, since the typical average for 40 km at these latitudes is near 13º C. Due to these anomalous temperatures, even though the scientists used standard highdensity styrofoam thermal insulation (which usually keeps the internal temperature 10º C above the external one), the internal temperature (at float altitude) experimented variations from 8º C to -24ºC and this caused the batteries (that is the power supplies of all detector electronics) to fail ~ 25 minutes after the float altitude has been reached (Postflight tests of the detectors batteries in a thermal chamber showed that the batteries begin to fail at 12º AC.) Nevertheless, the housekeeping batteries were different and supported the temperature variations, so the ground team was able to record several onboard parameters as well to measure the instrumental Hard X-Ray background spectrum at float altitude. These measurements enabled the science team to calculate the sensibility of the experiment, showing that the scientific objectives of the experiment were feasible. |
||||||||
External references and bibliographical sources
| ||||||||
| If you detected mistakes in the information presented here, please tell me (Updated on 17-Aug-2007 - 03:27:11pm) | ||||||||
| ||||||||